Findings that close
Audit and inspection findings feed directly into CAPA tracking, closing the loop through one process rather than a separate one.
Service → Milestone → Deliverable
Select a milestone to see what we deliver at that point in the program.
Why NoyMed
Anyone can run a checklist audit. Sponsors choose the team behind it — how well findings are directed by real risk, how fast CAPAs close with evidence behind them, and how few surprises show up at the real inspection.
Audit and inspection findings feed directly into CAPA tracking, closing the loop through one process rather than a separate one.
Oversight directed by the risk-based audit plan to where trial risk is highest, aligned with the site management team's monitoring plan.
Documented, defensible processes that hold up under sponsor and health authority review, backed by biostatistics and data teams when findings touch study data.
CAPAs are built on a documented root cause analysis, not a quick fix that lets the same finding recur next audit.
The TMF and QA documentation are audit-traceable throughout conduct, not assembled under pressure before the real inspection.
Findings come with practical corrective paths because the same auditors understand both the operational and data sides of a trial.
Beyond the standard deliverables
Structural QA support that doesn't map to a single milestone.
QMS design & maintenance — the risk-based oversight structure every audit and CAPA runs on.
Procedures authored, reviewed, and kept current, reflecting how the program actually runs.
Critical-to-quality factors, identified and monitored to direct where oversight goes next.
What sponsors say
Common questions
What sponsors typically ask before handing over their QA program.
Tell us your study phase, vendor landscape, and timeline — we'll walk through how our QA team plugs in.